All 3 top of your list are net negative for the world. By far. 

They navigate fiat currency, meta perpetuates it, warren is an investor inside fiat currency and that is net negative too. Bill gates have microsoft, microsoft have extreme negative impacts, he also perpetuates fiat somehow, and navigate real state that is all fake and depends on fiat to work. 


Free currency would promote more good than basically every philanthropy in the world combined. And most of those Philanthropics perpetuate fiat currency one way or another. 

Ending patents or promoting free currency will top every one of your items by far.

For instance forced course currency is the greatest generator of waste with 10x more impact than any of the items you listed.

Look at the cost to save a life like basic sanitations in an undeveloped country, in developed ones its just higher. 

Many environmental causes are detrimental to economy. From there trying to search for a non detrimental one would be a good start because it will be very hard to see the effective good.

I don't think subsidies should exist at all to start with.

I don't like the constitution concept. I don't want to see what abomination will come out from AI with this concept so I did not read past the title. 

A good starting point would be maybe choosing another word or something from the non aggression principle that basically all constitutions violate.

I think the probably foundations of your thinking are wrong to start with but I can't really judge because I didn't read.