I like the more curated approach. One question: is there an RSS feed available for the curated posts? The feed at https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/feed.xml gives the "new & updated" list rather than the "featured" list.
"In expectation, work to prevent the use of weapons of mass destruction (nuclear weapons, bio-engineered viruses, and perhaps new AI-powered weapons) as funded by Longview Philanthropy (Emerging Challenges Fund) and Founders Pledge (Global Catastrophic Risks Fund) is more effective at saving lives than Givewell's top charities."
I'm curious, did you decide on the entire year's worth of donations through an election? To me, donation elections can be a fun way to generate discussions around giving (I donated to the election fund here after all) but I would never let it decide on a significant part of my donations (let's say 1% at most). If you want to outsource the day-to-day decision making on what charities to give to, then I believe funds are a much more effective tool for that than elections or lotteries.
I didn't have a lot of time but I went through the list and selected a few charities that looked especially interesting or novel:
This is purely based on my gut feeling, so I will probably come back to consider my selection more carefully at a later point.
Update: after looking at the current leaderboard, I added ACE and AMF to my votes from a strategic perspective.
Thank you for making this analysis; it really encourages me to start again with talking more about EA to people here in the Netherlands!